AI and science: what 1,600 researchers think
nature.com · 584 words · saved by 1 readers
A Nature survey finds that scientists are concerned, as well as excited, by the increasing use of artificial-intelligence tools in research.
Email Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Whatsapp X Access through your institution Buy or subscribe Artificial-intelligence (AI) tools are becoming increasingly common in science, and many scientists anticipate that they will soon be central to the practice of research, suggests a Nature survey of more than 1,600 researchers around the world. Access options Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 52 print issues and onl
related reading
- Why an overreliance on AI-driven modelling is bad for sciencenature.com
- AI as Normal Technology | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org
- The AI revolution is running out of data. What can researchers do?nature.com
- Designing AI for Disruptive Scienceasimov.press
- Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence | Naturenature.com
- Scientists should use AI as a tool, not an oraclenormaltech.ai
- AI ‘scientists’ joined these research teams: here’s what happenednature.com
- Could AI slow science?normaltech.ai
- Seven Thoughts on "AI Scientists"corinwagen.github.io
- AI for Science: Scaling in AI for Scientific Discovery | AI for Scienceai4sciencecommunity.github.io
- A new golden age of discoveryaipolicyperspectives.com
- I got fooled by AI-for-science hype—here's what it taught meunderstandingai.org