Anthropic runs like Wile E. Coyote into the brick wall of consciousness research
substack.com · 3,630 words · saved by 1 readers
When the AI companies first began talking about existential risk, it was common to hear some version of:
When the AI companies first began talking about existential risk, it was common to hear some version of: “Look, this is bad for business, so obviously they must be telling the truth.” In retrospect, existential risk has been the best capital-raising tool ever in the history of the world. That doesn’t mean there were no true ethical motivations accompanying the doom warnings mixed in. There were. But in the end, embracing existential risk was also the right move from a cold-eyed business perspective. Similarly, it’s perplexing why a company would want their AI to be conscious. One could…
saved by
related reading
- A global workspace in language models \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- External commentary for global workspace paper -- final finalwww-cdn.anthropic.com
- No Space Like J-Space - by Zvi Mowshowitzthezvi.substack.com
- LessWronglesswrong.com
- Leaving Open Philanthropy, going to Anthropic - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Modelstransformer-circuits.pub
- A Review of Anthropic's Global Workspace Paper — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Don't dethrone consciousness! - by Erik Hoeltheintrinsicperspective.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- What Is Claude? Anthropic Doesn’t Know, Either | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- The New AI Consciousness Paper - by Scott Alexanderastralcodexten.com
- We should take AI welfare seriously - by Robert Longexperiencemachines.substack.com