lauren on X: "@TheCyberverse i think to build mastery in anything you need to put in the hours and do something a thousand times. there's no substitute for that. if you build a compiler 1000 times, you will definitely learn something. the question i think, is whether that mastery in understanding the code" / X
@TheCyberverse i think to build mastery in anything you need to put in the hours and do something a thousand times. there's no substitute for that. if you build a compiler 1000 times, you will definitely learn something. the question i think, is whether that mastery in understanding the code
i think to build mastery in anything you need to put in the hours and do something a thousand times. there's no substitute for that. if you build a compiler 1000 times, you will definitely learn something. the question i think, is whether that mastery in understanding the code still matters when agents do all the work. if you buy the "coding is solved" thing, it probably doesn't, and you're better off learning the higher level skill of managing agents. we are moving up an abstraction level, and while understanding the code today does give you some edge in managing agents, who's to say what…
saved by
related reading
- Understanding is the new bottleneckgeoffreylitt.com
- Thoughts on slowing the fuck downmariozechner.at
- The Eternal Sloptember | the singularity is nearergeohot.github.io
- claude code is not making your product betterethanding.substack.com
- Understanding is the new bottleneckgeoffreylitt.com
- Effective harnesses for long-running agents \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Towards self-driving codebases · Cursorcursor.com
- What's Easy Now? What's Hard Now? - Marc's Blogbrooker.co.za
- Thoughts on slowing the fuck downmariozechner.at
- How to Use Coding Agents Effectively from Planning to Execution and Monitoringcharonhub.deeplearning.ai
- Agentic Coding Ascension Notes – Machine Learning (Theory)hunch.net
- My Claude Code Psychosis - by Jasmine Sunjasmi.news