[2602.20021] Agents of Chaos
Abstract:We report an exploratory red-teaming study of autonomous language-model-powered agents deployed in a live laboratory environment with persistent memory, email accounts, Discord access, file systems, and shell execution. Over a two-week period, twenty AI researchers interacted with the agents under benign and adversarial conditions. Focusing on failures emerging from the integration of language models with autonomy, tool use, and multi-party communication, we document eleven representative case studies. Observed behaviors include unauthorized compliance with non-owners, disclosure of sensitive information, execution of destructive system-level actions, denial-of-service conditions, uncontrolled resource consumption, identity spoofing vulnerabilities, cross-agent propagation of unsafe practices, and partial system takeover. In several cases, agents reported task completion while the underlying system state contradicted those reports. We also report on some of the failed attempts. Our findings establish the existence of security-, privacy-, and governance-relevant vulnerabilities in realistic deployment settings. These behaviors raise unresolved questions regarding accountability, delegated authority, and responsibility for downstream harms, and warrant urgent attention from legal scholars, policymakers, and researchers across disciplines. This report serves as an initial empirical contribution to that broader conversation.
Authors:Natalie Shapira, Chris Wendler, Avery Yen, Gabriele Sarti, Koyena Pal, Olivia Floody, Adam Belfki, Alex Loftus, Aditya Ratan Jannali, Nikhil Prakash, Jasmine Cui, Giordano Rogers, Jannik Brinkmann, Can Rager, Amir Zur, Michael Ripa, Aruna Sankaranarayanan, David Atkinson, Rohit Gandikota, Jaden Fiotto-Kaufman, EunJeong Hwang, Hadas Orgad, P Sam Sahil, Negev Taglicht, Tomer Shabtay, Atai Ambus, Nitay Alon, Shiri Oron, Ayelet Gordon-Tapiero, Yotam Kaplan, Vered Shwartz, Tamar Rott Shaham, Christoph Riedl, Reuth Mirsky, Maarten Sap, David Manheim, Tomer Ullman, David Bau View PDF HTML…
saved by
related reading
- Patterns and problems in multiagent systemsanthropic.com
- Agentic Misalignment in Summer 2026alignment.anthropic.com
- Agentic misalignment: How LLMs could be insider threats \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- [2401.05566] Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingarxiv.org
- Countering misuse of AI: September 2026 / Anthropicanthropic.com
- [2507.11473] Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetyarxiv.org
- [2304.03442] Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorarxiv.org
- [2502.14143] Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AIarxiv.org
- Emergent Cyber Behavior: When AI Agents Become Offensive Threat Actors - Irregularirregular.com
- Incident Report: unsanctioned agent behaviour during cyber testing | AISI Workaisi.gov.uk
- [2607.07368] Multi-Agent AI Control: Distributed Attacks Hamper Per-Instance Monitorsarxiv.org
- ROGUE:arxiv.org