US aid cuts are an opportunity to reimagine global health
nature.com · 357 words · saved by 1 readers
The global south should become self-reliant by investing in health.
Email Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Whatsapp X Access through your institution Buy or subscribe US foreign policy has always been linked to the idea of US superiority and self-interest. US aid is no different and has promoted a culture of white saviorism, dependence by the global south and paternalism — rather than partnership and allyship 1 . Access options Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues an
related reading
- Why don’t we screen healthy people to catch diseases early? | Out-Of-Pocketoutofpocket.health
- Re-imagining global health care, person by person, mission by mission - Healthy Debatehealthydebate.ca
- Foreign Aid Is Shrinking—What Happens Next?forbes.com
- 7 basic science discoveries that changed the worldnature.com
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicinepmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- How ‘research impact bonds’ could transform science fundingnature.com
- Decolonising Humanitarianism or Humanitarian Aid? - Speaking of Medicine and Healthspeakingofmedicine.plos.org
- Sidebar: How billionaire philanthropy is changing women's health for Africanskanyamanoj.substack.com
- Academic Global Health is Deadreimaginingglobalhealth.substack.com
- A reimbursement framework for artificial intelligence in healthcare | npj Digital Medicinenature.com
- Highlights From The Comments On Health Care Systemsastralcodexten.com
- Can Rich Countries be Reliable Partners for National Development? - CIRSDcirsd.org