Righting a Wrong Question — LessWrong

lesswrong.com · 9,937 words · saved by 1 readers

When you are faced with an unanswerable question—a question to which it seems impossible to even imagine an answer—there is a simple trick which can turn the question solvable. Compare: The nice thing about the second question is that it is guaranteed to have a real answer, whether or not there is any such thing as free will. Asking "Why do I have free will?" or "Do I have free will?" sends you off thinking about tiny details of the laws of physics, so distant from the macroscopic level that you couldn't begin to see them with the naked eye. And you're asking "Why is X the case?" where X may not be coherent, let alone the case. "Why do I think I have free will?", in contrast, is guaranteed answerable. You do, in fact, believe you have free will. This belief seems far more solid and graspable than the ephemerality of free will. And there is, in fact, some nice solid chain of cognitive cause and effect leading up to this belief. If you've already outgrown free will, choose one of th

x Righting a Wrong Question — LessWrong Reductionism 101 Causality Introspection Rationality Frontpage 147 Righting a Wrong Question by Eliezer Yudkowsky 9th Mar 2008 4 min read 112 147 When you are faced with an unanswerable question—a question to which it seems impossible to even imagine an answer—there is a simple trick which can turn the question solvable. Compare: "Why do I have free will?" "Why do I think I have free will?" The nice thing about the second question is that it is guaranteed to have a real answer, whether or not there is any such thing as free will. Asking "Why do I have fr

Righting a Wrong Question — LessWrong

related reading