How Marxism and Buddhism complement each other | Aeon Essays

Life is suffering, whether you sit under a Bodhi Tree or stand with the workers. But do the two schools agree on the remedy?

Marxism and Buddhism might not seem to have much in common. The former is a materialist socioeconomic theory conceived by a 19th-century bearded guy from Trier in Germany, while the latter is a religion originating from orations delivered under a fig tree by a gaunt, peaceful, intimidating character in what is India today. Historically and geographically, they are as far apart as it gets, but the core of their philosophical analysis of the human condition is astoundingly close. It is so close, in fact, that Buddhist metaphysics can complement Marxist socioeconomic philosophy. As the…

saved by

• Sisyphus 55

related reading

• Karl Marx (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
• Neurotic Gradient Descent: (mis)Translating the Buddhaneuroticgradientdescent.blogspot.com
• Buddhist Economics: How to Start Prioritizing People Over Products and Creativity Over Consumption – The Marginalianthemarginalian.org
• When mindfulness meets capitalism, it loses its waypsyche.co
• Neurotic Gradient Descent: (mis)Translating the Buddhaneuroticgradientdescent.blogspot.com
• Karl Marx's Analysis of Capitalism: A Historical Perspective • Sociology.Institutesociology.institute
• Does Buddhist detachment allow for a healthier togetherness?aeon.co
• Can Buddhism Meet the Climate Crisis? | Lion’s Roarlionsroar.com
• DIALECTICAL MATERIALISMmarxists.org
• The tragic life and principled politics of Trần Đức Thảoaeon.co
• The Meridian of Her Greatnesssamzdat.com
• Buddhist Economics: How to Start Prioritizing People Over Products and Creativity Over Consumption – The Marginalianbrainpickings.org