How Marxism and Buddhism complement each other | Aeon Essays
aeon.co · 3,197 words · saved by 1 readers
Life is suffering, whether you sit under a Bodhi Tree or stand with the workers. But do the two schools agree on the remedy?
Marxism and Buddhism might not seem to have much in common. The former is a materialist socioeconomic theory conceived by a 19th-century bearded guy from Trier in Germany, while the latter is a religion originating from orations delivered under a fig tree by a gaunt, peaceful, intimidating character in what is India today. Historically and geographically, they are as far apart as it gets, but the core of their philosophical analysis of the human condition is astoundingly close. It is so close, in fact, that Buddhist metaphysics can complement Marxist socioeconomic philosophy. As the…
saved by
related reading
- Buddhist Economics: How to Start Prioritizing People Over Products and Creativity Over Consumption – The Marginalianthemarginalian.org
- Karl Marx (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Karl Marx's Analysis of Capitalism: A Historical Perspective • Sociology.Institutesociology.institute
- Marx's theory of alienation - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The idea of primitive communism is as seductive as it is wrongaeon.co
- Neurotic Gradient Descent: (mis)Translating the Buddhaneuroticgradientdescent.blogspot.com
- Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connectionsjetpress.org
- Can Buddhism Meet the Climate Crisis? | Lion’s Roarlionsroar.com
- Buddhist Economics: How to Start Prioritizing People Over Products and Creativity Over Consumption – The Marginalianbrainpickings.org
- Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat by Georg Lukacsmarxists.org
- Neurotic Gradient Descent: (mis)Translating the Buddhaneuroticgradientdescent.blogspot.com
- The Meridian of Her Greatnesssamzdat.com