nature-science-pnas-advice
thmatters.files.wordpress.com · 7,470 words · saved by 1 readers
N/A
Advice on submitting to Nature, Science, and PNAS Brief summary: • Have scientists from the relevant non-CS disciplines read and review your work before you submit. • For Nature/Science: write for a broad audience, have an interesting story, emphasize conceptual contributions. New ideas and interdisciplinary results are emphasized; mathematics is not valued, and should be significantly downplayed. • Science appears to be a little more receptive to CS papers than Nature. PNAS is more receptive to “mathy” papers, but the previous bullet-point…
related reading
- advicemath.ucr.edu
- How to win a best paper award (or, an opinionated take on how to do important research)nicholas.carlini.com
- A Survival Guide to a PhDkarpathy.github.io
- Advice for amateur mathematicians on writing and publishing papers – Henry Cohncohn.mit.edu
- Three Sins of Authors in Computer Science and Mathcs.cmu.edu
- Quick thoughts on researchmichaelnotebook.com
- Career advice | What's newterrytao.wordpress.com
- Real peer review has never been tried - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
- Three Sins of Authors in Computer Science and Mathcs.cmu.edu
- HOWTO: Apply for and get into grad school in science, engineering, mathematics and computer science: Tip, tricks, hints and mistakesmatt.might.net
- Highly Opinionated Advice on How to Write ML Papers — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI for Science: Scaling in AI for Scientific Discoveryai4sciencecommunity.github.io