The False Choice We Keep Making About AI
aischoollibrarian.substack.com · 913 words · saved by 1 readers
Why "For or Against" is Failing Librarians and Students
Created with ChatGPT Editor’s Note Over the past few weeks, I have seen Facebook posts and comments circulating that call out other colleagues and me by implication, for engaging with AI. Rather than responding in fragments or comment threads, I want to step back and address the larger issue those posts reveal. This piece is not a rebuttal or a defense of any single tool. It is an attempt to have the conversation our profession keeps circling without fully entering. The conversation around artificial intelligence in education and libraries has collapsed into a false choice. You are either…
saved by
related reading
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- Report – AI and Educationaiandeducation.mit.edu
- Doomprompting Is the New Doomscrolling.workingtheorys.com
- The Students Who Won’t Use AIteachingupsidedown.substack.com
- College Is Coming Aparttheatlantic.com
- Why You Should Almost Never Use AI to Write Anything Substantiveerichgrunewald.com
- Your AI Use Is Breaking My Brain404media.co
- should we use AI to write?velvetnoise.substack.com
- Collections: On ChatGPT – A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantryacoup.blog
- There Is No A.I. | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- AI makes the humanities more important, but also a lot weirderresobscura.substack.com
- the post-literate societyjasmi.news