[1911.01547] On the Measure of Intelligence
Abstract:To make deliberate progress towards more intelligent and more human-like artificial systems, we need to be following an appropriate feedback signal: we need to be able to define and evaluate intelligence in a way that enables comparisons between two systems, as well as comparisons with humans. Over the past hundred years, there has been an abundance of attempts to define and measure intelligence, across both the fields of psychology and AI. We summarize and critically assess these definitions and evaluation approaches, while making apparent the two historical conceptions of intelligence that have implicitly guided them. We note that in practice, the contemporary AI community still gravitates towards benchmarking intelligence by comparing the skill exhibited by AIs and humans at specific tasks such as board games and video games. We argue that solely measuring skill at any given task falls short of measuring intelligence, because skill is heavily modulated by prior knowledge and experience: unlimited priors or unlimited training data allow experimenters to "buy" arbitrary levels of skills for a system, in a way that masks the system's own generalization power. We then articulate a new formal definition of intelligence based on Algorithmic Information Theory, describing intelligence as skill-acquisition efficiency and highlighting the concepts of scope, generalization difficulty, priors, and experience. Using this definition, we propose a set of guidelines for what a general AI benchmark should look like. Finally, we present a benchmark closely following these guidelines, the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC), built upon an explicit set of priors designed to be as close as possible to innate human priors. We argue that ARC can be used to measure a human-like form of general fluid intelligence and that it enables fair general intelligence comparisons between AI systems and humans.
[1911.01547] On the Measure of Intelligence Skip to main content arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more × Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search --> Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:1911.01547 (cs) [Submitted on 5 Nov 2019 ( v1 ), last revised 25 Nov 2019 (this version, v2)] Title: On the Measure of Intelligence Authors: François Chollet View a PDF of the paper titled On the Measure of Intelligence, by Fran\c{c}ois Chollet View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: To make deliberate progress towards more intelligent and more human-like artific
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- [1911.01547] On the Measure of Intelligencearxiv.org
- Artificial General Intelligence Is Already Herenoemamag.com
- Moravec's paradox - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- 9 Open Problems and Directions about Intelligencema-lab-berkeley.github.io
- The hot mess theory of AI misalignment: More intelligent agents behave less coherently | Jascha’s blogsohl-dickstein.github.io
- General intelligence — LessWrongarbital.com
- Artificial General Intelligence Is Already Herenoemamag.com
- 2023 letter | Zhengdongzhengdongwang.com
- Complex Systems | The Point Magazinethepointmag.com
- Are AI benchmarks doomed? - by Anson Ho and Greg Burnhamepochai.substack.com
- The Yale Review | Melanie Mitchell: The Dangerous Unknowns at the…yalereview.org
- Intelligence as efficient model building | Alex’s blogatelfo.github.io