✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Indeterminacy of translation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org · 1,883 words · saved by 1 readers

The indeterminacy of translation is a thesis propounded by 20th-century American analytic philosopher W. V. Quine. The classic statement of this thesis can be found in his 1960 book Word and Object, which gathered together and refined much of Quine's previous work on subjects other than formal logic and set theory.[1] The indeterminacy of translation is also discussed at length in his Ontological Relativity.[2] Crispin Wright suggests that this "has been among the most widely discussed and controversial theses in modern analytical philosophy".[3] This view is endorsed by Hilary Putnam, who states that it is "the most fascinating and the most discussed philosophical argument since Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories".[4] Three aspects of indeterminacy arise, of which two relate to indeterminacy of translation.[5] The three indeterminacies are (i) inscrutability of reference, and (ii) holophrastic indeterminacy, and (iii) the underdetermination of scientific theory. The las

Indeterminacy of translation - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Philosophical argument posed by W. V. Quine (1960) The indeterminacy of translation is a thesis propounded by 20th-century American analytic philosopher W. V. Quine . The classic statement of this thesis can be found in his 1960 book Word and Object , which gathered together and refined much of Quine's previous work on subjects other than formal logic and set theory . [ 1 ] The indeterminacy of translation is also discussed at length in his Ontological Relativity . [ 2 ] Crispin Wright suggests that

Explore this link on the map →

related reading