flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Fine-Tuning Lowers Safety and Disrupts Evaluation Consistency

arxiv.org · 7,701 words · saved by 1 readers

This is experimental HTML to improve accessibility. We invite you to report rendering errors. Use Alt+Y to toggle on accessible reporting links and Alt+Shift+Y to toggle off. Learn more about this project and help improve conversions. HTML conversions sometimes display errors due to content that did not convert correctly from the source. This paper uses the following packages that are not yet supported by the HTML conversion tool. Feedback on these issues are not necessary; they are known and are being worked on. Authors: achieve the best HTML results from your LaTeX submissions by following these best practices. Fine-tuning a general-purpose large language model (LLM) for a specific domain or task has become a routine procedure for ordinary users. However, fine-tuning is known to remove the safety alignment features of the model, even when the fine-tuning data does not contain any harmful content. We consider this to be a critical failure mode of LLMs due to the widespread uptake of

Fine-Tuning Lowers Safety and Disrupts Evaluation Consistency Kathleen C. Fraser, Hillary Dawkins, Isar Nejadgholi, Svetlana Kiritchenko National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada {kathleen.fraser, hillary.dawkins, isar.nejadgholi, svetlana.kiritchenko}@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca Abstract Fine-tuning a general-purpose large language model (LLM) for a specific domain or task has become a routine procedure for ordinary users. However, fine-tuning is known to remove the safety alignment features of the model, even when the fine-tuning data does not contain any harmful content. We consider this to be a

Explore this link on the map →

related reading