Enthymeme - Wikipedia
An enthymeme (Greek: ἐνθύμημα, enthýmēma) is an argument with a hidden premise.[1][2] Enthymemes are usually developed from premises that accord with the audience's view of the world and what is taken to be common sense. However, where the general premise of a syllogism is supposed to be true, making the subsequent deduction necessary, the general premise of an enthymeme is merely probable, which leads only to a tentative conclusion.[3] Originally theorized by Aristotle, there are four types of enthymeme, at least two of which are described in Aristotle's work.[4] Aristotle referred to the enthymeme as "the body of proof", "the strongest of rhetorical proofs...a kind of syllogism" (Rhetoric I, 1.3,11). He considered it to be one of two kinds of proof, the other of which was the paradeigma. Maxims, Aristotle thought, were a derivative of enthymemes. (Rhetoric II.XX.1). Aristotle discusses two types of enthymemes: demonstrative [deiktika] and refutative [elentika or rézoi (ῥέζοι)].[5] (R
Enthymeme - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Type of rhetorical deductive argument Part of a series on Rhetoric History Ancient India Ancient Greece Asianism Atticism Attic orators Calliope Classical rhetoric Sophists Ancient Rome The age of Cicero Second Sophistic Middle Ages Byzantine rhetoric Trivium Renaissance Studia humanitatis Modern period Concepts Captatio benevolentiae Chironomia Decorum Delectare Docere Device Eloquence Eloquentia perfecta Eunoia Enthymeme Facilitas Fallacy Informal Figure of speech Scheme Trope Five canons Inventio Dispositio Elocutio
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Aristotle’s Rhetoric (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- How An Algorithm Feels From Inside — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Mind projection fallacy - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Local Validity as a Key to Sanity and Civilization — LessWronglesswrong.com
- 'Empiricism!' as Anti-Epistemology — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Expecting Short Inferential Distances — LessWronglesswrong.com
- An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Appeal to the stone - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Pragmatics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Synecdoche - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment – Bryn Mawr Classical Reviewbmcr.brynmawr.edu
- Expecting Short Inferential Distances — LessWronglesswrong.com