Being and Time, part 2: On 'mineness' | Simon Critchley | The Guardian
Simon Critchley: How to believe: For Heidegger, what defines the human being is the capacity to be puzzled by the deepest of questions: why is there something rather than nothing?
Cif belief Religion This article is more than 17 years old Being and Time, part 2: On 'mineness' This article is more than 17 years old Simon Critchley For Heidegger, what defines the human being is the capacity to be puzzled by the deepest of questions: why is there something rather than nothing? Mon 15 Jun 2009 03.00 EDT Last modified on Fri 12 Jun 2009 13.29 EDT Share A s Heidegger makes clear from the untitled, opening page with which Being and Time begins, what is at stake in the book is the question of being. This is the question that Aristotle raised in an untitled manuscript written 25
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Martin Heidegger (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Existentialism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Part 1, Division 3, Section 18 of, 'On Reading Being and Time, an Explication and Commentary' by Roderick Mundayvisual-memory.co.uk
- Being and Time, part 3: Being-in-the-world | Simon Critchley | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- Being and Time, part 1: Why Heidegger matters | Simon Critchley | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- Means and Meaning - Not Boring by Packy McCormicknotboring.co
- Fundamental ontology - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Existentialism is a Humanism, Jean-Paul Sartre 1946marxists.org
- Is Heidegger Contaminated by Nazism? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Simone de Beauvoir (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- The Meaning of Life Is Absurdmoretothat.com
- Hannah Arendt on Being vs. Appearing and Our Impulse for Self-Display – The Marginalianthemarginalian.org