✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Performance – Wren
wren.io · 1,410 words · saved by 1 readers
Even though most benchmarks aren’t worth the pixels they’re printed on, people seem to like them, so here’s a few:
Performance - Wren Performance Even though most benchmarks aren't worth the pixels they're printed on, people seem to like them, so here's a few: Method Call wren 0.12s luajit (-joff) 0.16s ruby 0.20s lua 0.35s python3 0.78s python 0.85s DeltaBlue wren 0.13s python3 0.48s python 0.57s Binary Trees luajit (-joff) 0.11s wren 0.22s ruby 0.24s python 0.37s python3 0.38s lua 0.52s Recursive Fibonacci luajit (-joff) 0.10s wren 0.20s ruby 0.22s lua 0.28s python 0.51s python3 0.57s Shorter bars are better. Each benchmark is run ten times and the best time is kept. It only measures the time taken to ex
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- abseil / Performance Hintsabseil.io
- The Alternative Implementation Problempointersgonewild.com
- Reddit - Please wait for verificationreddit.com
- NYSRGnotes.ekzhang.com
- Modern Python performance considerations [LWN.net]lwn.net
- A Deep Introduction to JIT Compilers: JITs are not very Just-in-time | kipply's blogkipply.github.io
- (Re)writing an interpreter in Rust – Danny van Kootendannyvankooten.com
- Speculation in JavaScriptCore | WebKitwebkit.org
- Behind The Scenes of Bun Install | Bun Blogbun.com
- A crash course in just-in-time (JIT) compilers - Mozilla Hacks - the Web developer bloghacks.mozilla.org
- Speeding Up the Webcola Graph Viz Library with Rust + WebAssembly - Casey Primozic's Homepagecprimozic.net
- Introduction · Crafting Interpreterscraftinginterpreters.com