✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Trapped Priors As A Basic Problem Of Rationality
astralcodexten.substack.com · 4,397 words · saved by 2 readers
P(A|B) = [P(A)*P(B|A)]/P(B), all the rest is commentary.
Trapped Priors As A Basic Problem Of Rationality Scott Alexander Mar 10, 2021 366 641 11 Share Introduction and review Last month I talked about van der Bergh et al’s work on the precision of sensory evidence , which introduced the idea of a trapped prior . I think this concept has far-reaching implications for the rationalist project as a whole. I want to re-derive it, explain it more intuitively, then talk about why it might be relevant for things like intellectual, political and religious biases. To review: the brain combines raw experience (eg sensations, memories) with context (eg priors,
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Making Beliefs Pay Rent (in Anticipated Experiences) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Biases: An Introductionreadthesequences.com
- The Meditation on Curiosity — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Rationalization — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Knowing About Biases Can Hurt People — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Biases: An Introduction — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Meditation on Curiosity — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Your Strength as a Rationalist — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Probabilities are not the right concept — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The "everyone is biased" bias - by Dan Williamsconspicuouscognition.com
- Privileging the Hypothesis — LessWronglesswrong.com