flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Troubles with the Bias-Variance tradeoff | Erik Jenner

ejenner.com · 3,221 words · saved by 1 readers

Arguably one of the most important concepts in machine learning, taught in any introductory course, is under- and overfitting. The story goes like this: if your model is too simplistic, you won’t be able to fit the data well and get a large error, you underfit. On the other hand, if your model is too complex, it will fit any noise that is present in the data, i.e. you overfit. Such a model won’t generalize to the test set, so you also get a large error. Somewhere in between those two is a sweet spot with minimal test error. The choice of words, under- and overfitting, already implies that we believe a tradeoff exists: they are two ends of a scale, and we need to find the point in the middle where we’re neither under- nor overfitting too much. Under- and overfitting can be formalized using the notions of bias and variance (there’ll be a short recap in the next section). Underfitting means that we have a high test error because of high bias, while overfitting means that high variance cau

(Last updated: 2021-04-22) Arguably one of the most important concepts in machine learning, taught in any introductory course, is under- and overfitting. The story goes like this: if your model is too simplistic, you won’t be able to fit the data well and get a large error, you underfit . On the other hand, if your model is too complex, it will fit any noise that is present in the data, i.e. you overfit . Such a model won’t generalize to the test set, so you also get a large error. Somewhere in between those two is a sweet spot with minimal test error. The choice of words, under- and overfitti

Explore this link on the map →

saved by

related reading