✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Shut Up and Divide? — LessWrong

lesswrong.com · 15,037 words · saved by 1 readers

During a recent discussion with komponisto about why my fellow LWers are so interested in the Amanda Knox case, his answers made me realize that I had been asking the wrong question. After all, feeling interest or even outrage after seeing a possible case of injustice seems quite natural, so perhaps a better question to ask is why am I so uninterested in the case. Reflecting upon that, it appears that I've been doing something like Eliezer's "Shut Up and Multiply", except in reverse. Both of us noticed the obvious craziness of scope insensitivity and tried to make our emotions work more rationally. But whereas he decided to multiply his concern for individuals human beings by the population size to an enormous concern for humanity as a whole, I did the opposite. I noticed that my concern for humanity is limited, and therefore decided that it's crazy to care much about random individuals that I happen to come across. (Although I probably haven't consciously thought about it in this way

x Shut Up and Divide? — LessWrong Shut Up and Multiply Altruism Human Values Philosophy Consequentialism Emotions Task Prioritization Frontpage 138 Shut Up and Divide? by Wei Dai 9th Feb 2010 1 min read 278 138 During a recent discussion with komponisto about why my fellow LWers are so interested in the Amanda Knox case, his answers made me realize that I had been asking the wrong question. After all, feeling interest or even outrage after seeing a possible case of injustice seems quite natural, so perhaps a better question to ask is why am I so un interested in the case. Reflecting upon that,

Explore this link on the map →

related reading