✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Questions about Apology

aarnphm.xyz · 925 words · saved by 1 readers

In Plato’s Apology, Socrates delineates a distinct boundary between pursuing a life of justice and engaging in politics. He posits that a life devoted to righteousness is fundamentally at odds with the realm of political involvement (Apology, pp. 41-42). Through the Socratic dialogues of Socrates’ own trials, Plato illustrates an examination of the moral and ethical foundations of the Athenian society and political system, underscored by Socrates’ assertions, “He who will fight for the right, if he would live even for a brief space, must have a private station and not a public one”. Consequently, I find myself aligning with Socrates’ perspective, asserting that leading a just life is an endeavour incompatible with holding political office. Socrates ascribes his abstention from political engagement to a divine mandate (“a voice”) directing him towards the pursuit of truth and virtue. At the onset of the trial, Socrates mentions a prophecy from the Oracle of Delphi, which declares that “

Question A voice turned Socrates away from politics. Wisely, as Socrates sees it. “Do you really imagine I could have survived all these years, if I had led a public life?” (42) You cannot serve both justice and the state. “He who will fight for the right, if he would live even for a brief space, must have a private station and not a public one”—that is, must lead a private, not a public life, if he is to survive. (41) Why does Socrates say this? What reasons can you find (whether in Apology or elsewhere) for his position? Summarise and explain in your own words. Is the idea one you find plaus

Explore this link on the map →

related reading