✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
The truth of the matter | Meta-rationality
metarationality.com · 2,050 words · saved by 1 readers
Formal rationality requires absolute truths, but those are rare in the eggplant-sized world. How do we do rationality without them?
Ostrich courtesy Krzysztof Niewolny Most true statements are not absolutely true. They may be true enough for all practical purposes; true in some sense; officially true, but effectively meaningless; true, other things being equal; true, as far as it goes; or true in theory, but not in practice. Generically, we can call these sort-of truths . 1 Sort-of truth causes trouble for most brands of rationalism . In particular, the formal methods underlying logicism and probabilism both depend on absolute truth. The fundamental principle of logical deduction is that it is absolute-truth-preserving . I
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- What Do We Mean By "Rationality"? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Twelve Virtues of Rationality – Eliezer S. Yudkowskyyudkowsky.net
- How To Think Real Good | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- The Useful Idea of Truth — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Four Theories of Truth As a Method for Critical Thinking - Commoncogcommoncog.com
- Making Beliefs Pay Rent (in Anticipated Experiences) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Rationalization — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Fucking Goddamn Basics of Rationalist Discourse — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The collapse of rational certainty | Meaningnessmeaningness.com
- Coherentism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Logical truth - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Richard Pettigrew | Philosophyrichardpettigrew.com