Following | Substack

One of the strange luxuries, and persistent challenges, of working in Google Labs is that you’re always living in the future. Or at least trying to. We’re building Jules in two time zones: now and not yet. On one hand, we have a real product in the world. People are using it. That means we owe them clarity, stability, and thoughtful iteration. Meet them where they are. Respect their time. Don’t get in their way. On the other hand, we’re inventing something that didn’t really exist before: new interfaces, new workflows, new instincts. That means we have to see around corners. Not just one step ahead, but ten. Otherwise we risk showing up too late. Or worse: too early, with a tool that no one’s ready for and no one case to anchor it. This is the paradox of Google Labs: be visionary, but also extremely grounded. Be fast, but not reckless. Ship with taste. Iterate with intention. And because we’re building in AI, the timeline compression is real. Sometimes you go from one step ahead to ten

One of the strange luxuries, and persistent challenges, of working in Google Labs is that you’re always living in the future. Or at least trying to. We’re building Jules in two time zones: now and not yet. On one hand, we have a real product in the world. People are using it. That means we owe them clarity, stability, and thoughtful iteration. Meet them where they are. Respect their time. Don’t get in their way. On the other hand, we’re inventing something that didn’t really exist before: new interfaces, new workflows, new instincts. That means we have to see around corners. Not just one step