✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Sabotage evaluations for frontier models \ Anthropic

anthropic.com · 1,510 words · saved by 1 readers

Any industry where there are potential harms needs evaluations. Nuclear power stations have continuous radiation monitoring and regular site inspections; new aircraft undergo extensive flight tests to prove their airworthiness. It’s no different for AI systems. New AI models go through a wide range of safety evaluations—for example, testing their capacity to assist in the creation of biological or chemical weapons. Such evaluations are built into our Responsible Scaling Policy, which guides our development of a model’s safeguards. As AIs become more capable, however, a new kind of risk might emerge: models with the ability to mislead their users, or subvert the systems we put in place to oversee them. A new paper by the Anthropic Alignment Science team describes a novel set of evaluations that test a model’s capacity for sabotage. We looked at four different types: We developed these evaluations as part of preparations for a future where much more capable AI models could develop these

Alignment Sabotage evaluations for frontier models Oct 18, 2024 Read the paper Any industry where there are potential harms needs evaluations. Nuclear power stations have continuous radiation monitoring and regular site inspections; new aircraft undergo extensive flight tests to prove their airworthiness. It’s no different for AI systems. New AI models go through a wide range of safety evaluations—for example, testing their capacity to assist in the creation of biological or chemical weapons. Such evaluations are built into our Responsible Scaling Policy , which guides our development of a mod

Explore this link on the map →

related reading