flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Harnad, S

southampton.ac.uk · 11,026 words · saved by 1 readers

Stevan Harnad Department of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM harnad@cogsci.soton.ac.uk http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/ KEYWORDS: cognitive neuroscience, cognitive science, computation, computationalism, consciousness, dynamical systems, epiphenomenalism, intelligence, machines, mental models, mind/body problem, other minds problem, philosophy of science, qualia, reverse engineering, robotics, Searle, symbol grounding, theory of mind, thinking,Turing, underdetermination, Zombies. 1. Intended Interpretation William Wimsatt (1954) originally proposed the notion of the "Intentional Fallacy" with poetry in mind, but his intended message applies equally to all forms of intended interpretation. It is a fallacy, according to Wimsatt, to see or seek the meaning of a poem exclusively or even primarily in the intentions of its author: The author figures causally in the text he created, to be sure, but his intended me

Harnad, S Harnad, S. (2001) Minds, Machines and Turing: The Indistinguishability of Indistinguishables. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information (special issue on "Alan Turing and Artificial Intelligence") http://www.wkap.nl/journalhome.htm/0925-8531 Minds, Machines and Turing MINDS, MACHINES AND TURING: THE INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF INDISTINGUISHABLES Stevan Harnad Department of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM harnad@cogsci.soton.ac.uk http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/ ABSTRACT: Turing's celebrated 1950 paper prop

Explore this link on the map →

related reading