Thou Art Godshatter - LessWrong
Before the 20th century, not a single human being had an explicit concept of "inclusive genetic fitness", the sole and absolute obsession of the blind idiot god. We have no instinctive revulsion of condoms or oral sex. Our brains, those supreme reproductive organs, don't perform a check for reproductive efficacy before granting us sexual pleasure. Why not? Why aren't we consciously obsessed with inclusive genetic fitness? Why did the Evolution-of-Humans Fairy create brains that would invent condoms? "It would have been so easy," thinks the human, who can design new complex systems in an afternoon. The Evolution Fairy, as we all know, is obsessed with inclusive genetic fitness. When she decides which genes to promote to universality, she doesn't seem to take into account anything except the number of copies a gene produces. (How strange!) But since the maker of intelligence is thus obsessed, why not create intelligent agents - you can't call them humans - who would likewise care purely about inclusive genetic fitness? Such agents would have sex only as a means of reproduction, and wouldn't bother with sex that involved birth control. They could eat food out of an explicitly reasoned belief that food was necessary to reproduce, not because they liked the taste, and so they wouldn't eat candy if it became detrimental to survival or reproduction. Post-menopausal women would babysit grandchildren until they became sick enough to be a net drain on resources, and would then commit suicide. It seems like such an obvious design improvement - from the Evolution Fairy's perspective. Now it's clear, as was discussed yesterday, that it's hard to build a powerful enough consequentialist. Natural selection sort-of reasons consequentially, but only by depending on the actual consequences. Human evolutionary theorists have to do really high-falutin' abstract reasoning in order to imagine the links between adaptations and reproductive success. But human brains clearly can imag
x Thou Art Godshatter — LessWrong The Simple Math of Evolution Eldritch Analogies Evolution Evolutionary Psychology World Modeling Frontpage 259 Thou Art Godshatter by Eliezer Yudkowsky 13th Nov 2007 7 min read 84 259 Before the 20th century, not a single human being had an explicit concept of "inclusive genetic fitness", the sole and absolute obsession of the blind idiot god . We have no instinctive revulsion of condoms or oral sex. Our brains, those supreme reproductive organs , don't perform a check for reproductive efficacy before granting us sexual pleasure. Why not? Why aren't we conscio
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Prolegomena to a Theory of Fun — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Uncategories and empty categories — LessWronglesswrong.com
- An Alien God — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Fun Theory Sequence — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Meditations On Molochslatestarcodexabridged.com
- Focus on the places where you feel shocked everyone's dropping the ball — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Fake Optimization Criteria — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Adaptation-Executers, not Fitness-Maximizers — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Evolutionary Psychology — LessWronglesswrong.com
- ⿻ Symbiogenesis vs. Convergent Consequentialism — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What’s the Point If We Can’t Have Fun?thebaffler.com