[2506.10805] Detecting High-Stakes Interactions with Activation Probes
Abstract:Monitoring is an important aspect of safely deploying Large Language Models (LLMs). This paper examines activation probes for detecting ``high-stakes'' interactions -- where the text indicates that the interaction might lead to significant harm -- as a critical, yet underexplored, target for such monitoring. We evaluate several probe architectures trained on synthetic data, and find them to exhibit robust generalization to diverse, out-of-distribution, real-world data. Probes' performance is comparable to that of prompted or finetuned medium-sized LLM monitors, while offering computational savings of six orders-of-magnitude. These savings are enabled by reusing activations of the model that is being monitored. Our experiments also highlight the potential of building resource-aware hierarchical monitoring systems, where probes serve as an efficient initial filter and flag cases for more expensive downstream analysis. We release our novel synthetic dataset and the codebase at this https URL.
Abstract:Monitoring is an important aspect of safely deploying Large Language Models (LLMs). This paper examines activation probes for detecting ``high-stakes'' interactions -- where the text indicates that the interaction might lead to significant harm -- as a critical, yet underexplored, target for such monitoring. We evaluate several probe architectures trained on synthetic data, and find them to exhibit robust generalization to diverse, out-of-distribution, real-world data. Probes' performance is comparable to that of prompted or finetuned medium-sized LLM monitors, while offering computat
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- [2506.10805] Detecting High-Stakes Interactions with Activation Probesarxiv.org
- Chapter 1: Transformer Interpretability - ARENAlearn.arena.education
- Should We Train Against (CoT) Monitors? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- [2601.11516] Building Production-Ready Probes For Geminiarxiv.org
- When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitorsarxiv.org
- Probe-Based Data Attribution: Surfacing and Mitigating Undesirable Behaviors in LLM Post-Traininggoodfire.ai
- Neural Chameleons: LLMs Can Learn to Evade Activation Monitorsneuralchameleons.com
- Features as Rewards: Using Interpretability to Reduce Hallucinationsgoodfire.ai
- Introspection Adapters: Training LLMs to Report Their Learned Behaviorsarxiv.org
- Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations — LessWronglesswrong.com
- You Can Catch Sleeper Agents by Teaching Another Model to Imitate Them — LessWronglesswrong.com
- [2512.11949] Neural Chameleons: Language Models Can Learn to Hide Their Thoughts from Unseen Activation Monitorsarxiv.org