✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
2021 AI Alignment Literature Review and Charity Comparison - EA Forum
forum.effectivealtruism.org · 62 words · saved by 1 readers
INTRODUCTION As in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 I have attempted to review the research that has been produced by various organisations working on AI safety, to help potential donors gain a better…
Misha_Yagudin 4y 33 0 0 I am confused about the relevance of Ought's work to AI alignment. They got early solid endorsements for testing Christiano's ideas around factored cognition but since pivoted to work on Elicit, which seems really cool but doesn't feel very alignment related to me. I would appreciate someone making a case clarifying the relevance/importance of their work. Reply
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- LessWronglesswrong.com
- AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Alignment remains a hard, unsolved problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Critical review of Christiano's disagreements with Yudkowsky — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AGI safety career advice — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- The Best of LessWrong — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Oughtought.org
- The Best of LessWrong — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Field map – AISafety.comaisafety.com
- 2020 AI Alignment Literature Review and Charity Comparison — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Can we safely automate alignment research? - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- The Field of AI Alignment: A Postmortem, and What To Do About It — LessWronglesswrong.com