✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? - Joe Carlsmith
joecarlsmith.com · 9,667 words · saved by 1 readers
Who needs a system if you're free?
Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? - Joe Carlsmith Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? Contents hide 1. Introduction 2. The problem 2.1 Map-making with no territory 2.2 Why curve-fit? 2.3 Who needs ethics if you’re free? 3. Some examples where this stuff comes up 3.1 Drowning children stuff 3.2 Lizard stuff 3.3 Scott Alexander on rejecting the “philosophy game” 4. I’m not trying to turn you into a lizard 5. Some kind of brute preference for consistency and systematization? 6. Money-pumps 6.1 Dialogue with an intransitive agent 6.2 Coherence isn’t free 6.3 Can we even think out
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Seeing more whole - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- How To Be Good | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Alienation and meta-ethics (or: is it possible you should maximize helium?) - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Fake thinking and real thinking - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Future-proof ethicscold-takes.com
- Derek Parfit - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- On sincerity - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- On the limits of idealized values - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- LLM Alignment, ethical and mathematical realism, and the most important actions in davidad's understanding — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why I am not an effective altruist - by Erik Hoeltheintrinsicperspective.com
- Effective altruism in the garden of ends — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Consequentialism FAQweb.archive.org