✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
6 Heuristics for Assessing the Quality of a Publication
francescolelli.info · 882 words · saved by 1 readers
Heuristics for Assessing the Quality of a Publication may introduce bias in your analysis but can also save you time if properly used
6 Heuristics for Assessing the Quality of a Publication Skip to content 6 Heuristics for Assessing the Quality of a Publication This article is about h euristics for assessing the quality of a publication: emphasis on Heuristics . Consequently, there will be always a case where these guidelines will be incorrect. Unfortunately, the alternative is been able to read and categorize all the scientific articles in the world; I am pretty sure that you do not have that much time. If that is the alternative some heuristics may guide you in forming an opinion prior reading a scientific paper. This opin
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- How to Read Scientific Papers Quickly and Effectivelyfrancescolelli.info
- How to win a best paper award (or, an opinionated take on how to do important research)nicholas.carlini.com
- Heuristics for Scientific Writing (a Machine Learning Perspective) – Approximately Correctapproximatelycorrect.com
- Real peer review has never been tried - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output - PMCpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Brian Scholl: Misc Academic Musingsperception.yale.edu
- How to Read a Paperweb.stanford.edu
- How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- The Business of Extracting Knowledge from Academic Publicationsmarkusstrasser.org
- The rise and fall of peer review - by Adam Mastroianniexperimentalhistory.substack.com
- Highly Opinionated Advice on How to Write ML Papers — LessWronglesswrong.com
- RajLabrajlaboratory.blogspot.com