✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversion

arxiv.org · 21,857 words · saved by 1 readers

This is experimental HTML to improve accessibility. We invite you to report rendering errors. Use Alt+Y to toggle on accessible reporting links and Alt+Shift+Y to toggle off. Learn more about this project and help improve conversions. HTML conversions sometimes display errors due to content that did not convert correctly from the source. This paper uses the following packages that are not yet supported by the HTML conversion tool. Feedback on these issues are not necessary; they are known and are being worked on. Authors: achieve the best HTML results from your LaTeX submissions by following these best practices. As large language models (LLMs) become more powerful and are deployed more autonomously, it will be increasingly important to prevent them from causing harmful outcomes. Researchers have investigated a variety of safety techniques for this purpose, e.g. using models to review the outputs of other models, or red-teaming techniques to surface subtle failure modes. However, rese

AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversion Ryan Greenblatt ∗ Buck Shlegeris Kshitij Sachan Fabien Roger Redwood Research Abstract As large language models (LLMs) become more powerful and are deployed more autonomously, it will be increasingly important to prevent them from causing harmful outcomes. Researchers have investigated a variety of safety techniques for this purpose, e.g. using models to review the outputs of other models, or red-teaming techniques to surface subtle failure modes. However, researchers have not evaluated whether such techniques still ensure safety if t

Explore this link on the map →

related reading