Integrity for consequentialists — EA Forum
For most people I don't think it's important to have a really precise definition of integrity. But if you really want to go all-in on consequentialis…
Paul_Christiano 3y 37 1 0 I still broadly endorse this post. Here are some ways my views have changed over the last 6 years: At the time I wrote the OP I considered consequentialist evaluation the only rubric for judging principles like this, and the only reason we needed anything else was because of the intractability of consequentialist reasoning or moral uncertainty. I’m now more sympathetic to other moral intuitions and norms, and think my previous attempts to shoehorn them into a consequentialist justification involve some motivated cognition and philosophical error. That said I’m now mor
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Notes on Effective Altruismmichaelnotebook.com
- Consequentialism FAQweb.archive.org
- Reflective Equilibrium (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Virtue Ethics for Consequentialists — LessWronglesswrong.com
- On sincerity - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Deontology and virtue ethics as "effective theories" of consequentialist ethics — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Impartiality (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2022 Edition)plato.stanford.edu
- Frontiers | On Consequentialism and Fairnessfrontiersin.org
- Rule Consequentialism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- You're allowed to be inconsistentmindingourway.com
- The importance of how you weigh it - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Future-proof ethicscold-takes.com