flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Transluce on X: "Is your LM secretly an SAE? Most circuit-finding interpretability methods use learned features rather than raw activations, based on the belief that neurons do not cleanly decompose computation. In our new work, we show MLP neurons actually do support sparse, faithful circuits! https://t.co/lTBbUqoRlt" / Twitter

x.com · 72 words · saved by 1 readers

To view keyboard shortcuts, press question mark View keyboard shortcuts Added to your Bookmarks Add to Folder Tweet See new posts Conversation Neil Rathi reposted Transluce @TransluceAI Is your LM secretly an SAE? Most circuit-finding interpretability methods use learned features rather than raw activations, based on the belief that neurons do not cleanly decompose computation. In our new work, we show MLP neurons actually do support sparse, faithful circuits! 11:00 AM · Nov 20, 2025 ·Twitter Web App 9 Quote Tweets 5 74 249 216 Tweet your reply Reply Transluce @TransluceAI · Nov 20 Comparing with sparse autoencoders (SAEs), we show that circuits traced directly on a model’s MLP neurons can be just as sparse and faithful. We use two advances to achieve this result. 1 22 Transluce @TransluceAI · Nov 20 First, we use MLP neurons instead of MLP outputs as the units of our circuits. Due to the preceding nonlinearity, features are encouraged to align with the MLP neuron basis. 1 21 Transl

Transluce @TransluceAI Is your LM secretly an SAE? Most circuit-finding interpretability methods use learned features rather than raw activations, based on the belief that neurons do not cleanly decompose computation. In our new work, we show MLP neurons actually do support sparse, faithful circuits! 7:00 PM · Nov 20, 2025 133.2K Views 7 0 7 77 0 7 7 376 0 3 7 6 345 0 3 4 5 Read 7 replies

Explore this link on the map →

related reading