✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
The Reparameterization Trick
gregorygundersen.com · 3,119 words · saved by 1 readers
Gregory Gundersen is a quantitative researcher in New York.
The Reparameterization Trick --> Home Blog RSS The Reparameterization Trick A common explanation for the reparameterization trick with variational autoencoders is that we cannot backpropagate through a stochastic node. I provide a more formal justification. Published 29 April 2018 Informal justifications In Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes , (Kingma & Welling, 2013) , Kingma presents an unbiased, differentiable, and scalable estimator for the ELBO in variational inference. A key idea behind this estimator is the reparameterization trick . But why do we need this trick in the first place? When f
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Mediumandacdemir-94699.medium.com
- Tutorial - What is a variational autoencoder? – Jaan Lı 李jaan.io
- Variational autoencoder - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Bayesian Neural Networkscs.toronto.edu
- Difference between AutoEncoder (AE) and Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) | Towards Data Sciencetowardsdatascience.com
- Approximating KL Divergencejoschu.net
- What are Diffusion Models? | Lil'Loglilianweng.github.io
- Diffusion Models as a kind of VAE | Angus Turnerangusturner.github.io
- From Autoencoder to Beta-VAE | Lil'Loglilianweng.github.io
- Variational autoencoders.jeremyjordan.me
- Eric Jang: A Beginner's Guide to Variational Methods: Mean-Field Approximationblog.evjang.com
- Anas Aldadi on X: "We know VAEs try to match *Density values* using KL-Divergence, while score-matching try to match *Density gradients* using Fisher-Divergence but do you know that if you take KL and add Gaussian noise to it, the derivative of KL with respect to noise level is actually F-Div https://t.co/e6k6hhUhFT" / Xx.com