Bringing Back the Fairness Doctrine Won’t Cure What Ails Modern Media
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Zócalo Public Square. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact. You may opt out or contact us anytime. A couple listens to the radio in 1957. Courtesy of the Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. by ALLISON PERLMAN | APRIL 12, 2021 The Fairness Doctrine—the federal communications policy, in place from 1949 to 1987, that required U.S. broadcasters to address controversial issues and provide airtime to conflicting sides—is newly popular. Advocates for the policy’s return view it as a potential solution to divisive and destructive problems of our contemporary media environment, particularly as a way to mitigate disinformation in partisan media outlets. But restoring the original rule, especially with its narrow application to broadcast stations, woul
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... The Fairness Doctrine—the federal communications policy, in place from 1949 to 1987, that required U.S. broadcasters to address controversial issues and provide airtime to conflicting sides—is newly popular. Advocates for the policy’s return view it as a potential solution to divisive and destructive problems of our contemporary media environment, particularly as a way to mitigate disinformation in partisan media outlets. But restoring the original rule, especially with its narrow application to broadcast stations, would do no such thing. It’s useful
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- A Vaster Wasteland - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- American Rhetoric: Newton Minow -- Address to the National Association of Broadcasters (Television and the Public Interest)americanrhetoric.com
- The ‘vast wasteland,’ reconsidered — Harvard Gazettenews.harvard.edu
- Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- The Great Unbundling – Stratechery by Ben Thompsonstratechery.com
- matduggan.com/the-intolerable-hypocrisy-of-cyberlibertarianism/matduggan.com
- How Radio Wrecks the Right - The American Conservativetheamericanconservative.com
- Lawful but Awful? Control over Legal Speech by Platforms, Governments, and Internet Users – The University of Chicago Law Review Onlinelawreviewblog.uchicago.edu
- Monthly Roundup #21: August 2024 - by Zvi Mowshowitzthezvi.substack.com
- Why the Left Can’t Stand The New York Times - Columbia Journalism Reviewcjr.org
- Daron Acemoglu on X: "This is the second part of what I had promised to explain: why I believe a certain type of content moderation is key for social media. First, I do see the dark side of content moderation: https://t.co/uwcDCexDKP: Freedx.com
- Content and Community – Stratechery by Ben Thompsonstratechery.com