You don't get to know what you're fighting for
A number of my recent posts may have given you the impression that I know exactly what I'm fighting for. If someone were to ask you, "hey, what's that Nate guy trying so hard to do," you might answer something like "increase the chance of human survival,
A number of my recent posts may have given you the impression that I know exactly what I'm fighting for . If someone were to ask you, "hey, what's that Nate guy trying so hard to do," you might answer something like "increase the chance of human survival," or "put an end to unwanted death" or "reduce suffering" or something. This isn't the case. I mean, I am doing those things, but those are all negative motivations: I am against Alzheimer's, I am against human extinction, but what am I for? The truth is, I don't quite know. I'm for something , that's for damn sure, and I have lots of feelings
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Half-assing it with everything you've gotmindingourway.com
- Effective altruism in the garden of ends — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- The Stamp Collector — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Too busy to think about life — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What Rationality Actually Looks Like From the Inside (4500 words) | meditationstuffmeditationstuff.wordpress.com
- Seeing more whole - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Dark Arts of Rationality — LessWronglesswrong.com
- In Search of All Soulsthinkingcomplete.com
- Value is Fragile — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Heading Toward Morality — LessWronglesswrong.com