✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

"cranks" on Usenet?

bio.net · 696 words · saved by 1 readers

"cranks" on Usenet? Una Smith una at doliolum.biology.yale.edu Wed Jul 27 11:51:55 EST 1994 Previous message: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: MOLLUSCS/bionet.molbio.molluscs Next message: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: FETAL-CELL-DIAGNOSTICS/bionet.diagnostics.fetal-cell Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Lachlan Cranswick wrote: >Ignoring for the moment that (thankfully) bionet is not officially >part of the Usenet and does not have to follow Usenet "guidelines" - >that effectively discourage new serious science newsgroups. Newsgroups on scientific topics are no more discouraged than those on any other topic. In fact, I would say the opposite was true: sci.* and comp.* newsgroup proposals seem to meet with far less resistance from the public in news.groups than do proposals for newsgroups in other hierarchies. Regardless, I seem to recall Lachlan Cranswick was involved for a time in the proposal for sci.geo.oceanography, which has passed smoothly

"cranks" on Usenet? Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP --> "cranks" on Usenet? Una Smith una at doliolum.biology.yale.edu Wed Jul 27 11:51:55 EST 1994 Previous message: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: MOLLUSCS/bionet.molbio.molluscs Next message: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: FETAL-CELL-DIAGNOSTICS/bionet.diagnostics.fetal-cell Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Lachlan Cranswick < lachlan at dmp.csiro.au > wrote: > Ignoring for the moment that (thankfully) bionet is not officially > part of the Usenet and does not have to follow Usenet "guidelines" - > that

Explore this link on the map →

related reading