OpenAI Backs Bill That Would Limit Liability for AI-Enabled Mass Deaths or Financial Disasters | WIRED
The ChatGPT-maker testified in favor of an Illinois bill that would limit when AI labs can be held liable—even in cases where their products cause “critical harm.”
Save this story Save this story OpenAI is throwing its support behind an Illinois state bill that would shield AI labs from liability in cases where AI models are used to cause serious societal harms, such as death or serious injury of 100 or more people or at least $1 billion in property damage. The effort seems to mark a shift in OpenAI’s legislative strategy . Until now, OpenAI has largely played defense, opposing bills that could have made AI labs liable for their technology’s harms. Several AI policy experts tell WIRED that SB 3444—which could set a new standard for the industry—is a more
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Is OpenAI changing its tune on AI laws?transformernews.ai
- The best AI bill yet may not get fartransformernews.ai
- AI’s next big blue battleground - by Veronica Irwintransformernews.ai
- AI populism's safety problemtransformernews.ai
- America’s AI Action Planwhitehouse.gov
- AI #78: Some Welcome Calm | Don't Worry About the Vasethezvi.wordpress.com
- ‘The Godmother of AI’ says California’s well-intended AI bill will harm the U.S. ecosystem | Fortunefortune.com
- How Should AI Liability Work? (Part I) - by Dean W. Ballhyperdimensional.co
- What You Need to Know About SB 1047: A Q&A with Anjney Midha | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- What is the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act? The debate behind SB 53, the landmark CA law, explained | Voxvox.com
- Why open-weight models without guardrails are a AI safety risk : NPRnpr.org
- RTFB: The RAISE Act - by Zvi Mowshowitzthezvi.substack.com