Comments - Give AIs a stake in the future

This manages to almost completely ignore the problem while jumping to policy recommendation (no regulation, accelerate). 1. Stability of the political system: stability of state redistributing the AI generated wealth likely requires humans keep very large influence in the political system and some form of control over the state. Examples where some group lost all econ power but kept political power seem rare or nonexistent (cf european aristocracy). US government governing Apple is not particularly strong argument: one fact about economy which have not changed for more than a century is labour share on GDP. Given the fact that humans are the dominant factor in the economy, government also needs them as power base. Unfortunately we are discussing a scenario where this changes, leading to risk of state becoming misaligned (cf https://gradual-disempowerment.ai/misaligned-states, https://intelligence-curse.ai/) 2. Indexing is hard / Capital ownership will not prevent human disempowerment h

This manages to almost completely ignore the problem while jumping to policy recommendation (no regulation, accelerate). 1. Stability of the political system: stability of state redistributing the AI generated wealth likely requires humans keep very large influence in the political system and some form of control over the state. Examples where some group lost all econ power but kept political power seem rare or nonexistent (cf european aristocracy). US government governing Apple is not particularly strong argument: one fact about economy which have not changed for more than a century is labour