✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Break the Department of Defense’s Acquisition Monopsony
firstbreakfast.com · 1,138 words · saved by 1 readers
For a long time, Walmart was a monopsony.
Break the Department of Defense’s Acquisition Monopsony Shyam Sankar , Madeline Hart , and Greg Little Sep 20, 2023 30 4 Share For a long time, Walmart was a monopsony. The inverse of a monopoly, a monopsony results when one entity is the sole buyer of a given product or service. Walmart developed a notorious reputation of using its monopsonistic power to force its vendors to meet its terms, which in turn allowed it to set extremely low consumer prices. But in a monopsony, the lowest price isn’t the best price for the market because it hides the true cost, drives down quality, and decreases co
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- The Defense Reformation18theses.com
- Laws of Tech: Commoditize Your Complement · Gwern.netgwern.net
- How to Fix Defense Procurement - by Santi Ruiz - Statecraftstatecraft.pub
- Laws of Tech: Commoditize Your Complement · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox | Yale Law Journalyalelawjournal.org
- The rise and fall of the industrial R&D lab - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
- Adobe to acquire Figma for $20B | Hacker Newsnews.ycombinator.com
- Balance of powervitalik.eth.limo
- America’s monopoly and antitrust problem, explained by your internet bill | Voxvox.com
- How to Buy Stuff Like DARPA Does - by Santi Ruizstatecraft.pub
- Consoles and Competition – Stratechery by Ben Thompsonstratechery.com
- In Conversation with Dan Akersontimelesspartners.com