✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
They Studied Dishonesty. Was Their Work a Lie? | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 11,526 words · saved by 1 readers
Dan Ariely and Francesca Gino became famous for their research into why we bend the truth. Now they’ve both been accused of fabricating data.
Save this story Save this story The half-bearded behavioral economist Dan Ariely tends to preface discussions of his work—which has inquired into the mechanisms of pain, manipulation, and lies—with a reminder that he comes by both his eccentric facial hair and his academic interests honestly. He tells a version of the story in the introduction to his breezy first book, “Predictably Irrational,” a patchwork of marketing advice and cerebral self-help. One afternoon in Israel, Ariely—an “18-year-old military trainee,” according to the Times —was nearly incinerated. “An explosion of a large magnes
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Cargo Cult Sciencecalteches.library.caltech.edu
- The Science & Psychology of Lyingtownandcountrymag.com
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Hey would you mind killing that patient for me thnxexperimental-history.com
- Confront reality (Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought)aaronsw.com
- Psychology of Human Misjudgment (Transcript) by Charlie Mungerfs.blog
- Scientific Fraud Is Slippery to Catch—but Easier to Combat | WIREDwired.com
- Brandolini's law - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Sokal affair - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Column: Why Businesses Don’t Experimenthbr.org
- Gwern's Most Important Writing (in essays, tweets, book reviews, and other forms) - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- Models don’t seem to be dishonest in the way humans are — LessWronglesswrong.com