✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Many arguments for AI x-risk are wrong — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 15,325 words · saved by 1 readers
The following is a lightly edited version of a memo I wrote for a retreat. It was inspired by a draft of Counting arguments provide no evidence for A…
x Many arguments for AI x-risk are wrong — LessWrong Deceptive Alignment AI Risk Skepticism AI Governance Counting arguments Language Models (LLMs) AI Community Frontpage 182 Many arguments for AI x-risk are wrong by TurnTrout 5th Mar 2024 AI Alignment Forum 15 min read 96 182 Ω 48 The following is a lightly edited version of a memo I wrote for a retreat. It was inspired by a draft of Counting arguments provide no evidence for AI doom . I think that my post covers important points not made by the published version of that post. I'm also thankful for the dozens of interesting conversations and
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Many arguments for AI x-risk are wrong — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- AI in 2025: gestalt — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Alignment remains a hard, unsolved problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Recommendations for Technical AI Safety Research Directionsalignment.anthropic.com
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Unfalsifiable stories of doom | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work
- A positive case for how we might succeed at prosaic AI alignment — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- Thinking about reasoning models made me less worried about scheming — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Thinking about reasoning models made me less worried about scheming — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Best of LessWrong — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How will we update about scheming? — LessWronglesswrong.com