✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Interpretability vs Neuroscience [rough note]
colah.github.io · 1,500 words · saved by 1 readers
A list of advantages that make understanding artificial nerural networks much easier than biological ones.
Interpretability vs Neuroscience [rough note] -- colah's blog Interpretability vs Neuroscience Six major advantages which make artificial neural networks much easier to study than biological ones. Posted on March 12th, 2021 This article is a rough note. Writing rough notes allows me share more content, since polishing takes lots of time. While I hope it's useful, it's likely lower quality and less carefully considered than my usual articles. It's very possible I wouldn't stand by this content if I thought about it more. I study what goes on inside artificial neural networks. I don’t know anyth
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Zoom In: An Introduction to Circuitsdistill.pub
- Toy Models of Superpositiontransformer-circuits.pub
- Analogies between Biology and Deep Learning [rough note] -- colah's blogcolah.github.io
- Distill — Latest articles about machine learningdistill.pub
- https://io0.github.ioio0.github.io
- The Building Blocks of Interpretabilitydistill.pub
- How Computationally Complex Is a Single Neuron? | Quanta Magazinequantamagazine.org
- Dario Amodei — The Urgency of Interpretabilitydarioamodei.com
- Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor? | PLOS Computational Biologyjournals.plos.org
- On Optimism for Interpretabilitygoodfire.ai
- The World Inside Neural Networksgoodfire.ai
- Multimodal Neurons in Artificial Neural Networksdistill.pub