✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
或许设计需要减少一些工作量才能更受重视
twongsthoughts.substack.com · 930 words · saved by 1 readers
A reflection on the next cycle of design’s evolution.
Maybe Design Needs to Do Less to Be Taken More Seriously A reflection on the next cycle of design’s evolution. Tony Wong Nov 11, 2025 3 Share Every few years, the same argument makes the rounds: If design wants a seat in the boardroom, it needs to learn more about business. I just read another version of that in MIT Sloan Review , and I can’t help but feel we’ve been chasing the wrong end of that logic. Yes — designers should absolutely learn about business. Deeply. Intelligently. Respectfully. But why we learn it matters even more than what we learn. Design’s Decades-Long Obsession with “Dese
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- 101 Design Rules | COLLINSwearecollins.com
- Learning to See - iAia.net
- No More Boring Apps | !Boringandy.works
- The State of UX in 2025trends.uxdesign.cc
- The emergence of the growth designeradobe.design
- No More Boring Apps | !Boringnotboring.software
- Why the definition of design might need a change | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- Design Literacy - by Willem Van Lancker - WVLvanlancker.substack.com
- May-Li Khoe on pulling inspiration from the physical world in digital designnotion.so
- Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong? | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- The Case for Adding DesignOps to Your Org Chart — Lessons From InVisionreview.firstround.com
- What Does It Mean to Decolonize Design? – Eye on Designeyeondesign.aiga.org