✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Are we witnessing the dawn of post-theory science? | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The Guardian
theguardian.com · 2,016 words · saved by 1 readers
Does the advent of machine learning mean the classic methodology of hypothesise, predict and test has had its day?
Illustration by PM Images/Getty Images. Does the advent of machine learning mean the classic methodology of hypothesise, predict and test has had its day? By Laura Spinney Sun 9 Jan 2022 04.00 EST Share Prefer the Guardian on Google The Guardian’s journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more . I saac Newton apocryphally discovered his second law – the one about gravity – after an apple fell on his head. Much experimentation and data analysis later, he realised there was a fundamental relationship between force, mass and acceler
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Dario Amodei — Machines of Loving Gracedarioamodei.com
- Designing AI for Disruptive Scienceasimov.press
- A new golden age of discovery — Google DeepMinddeepmind.google
- Dario Amodei — Machines of Loving Gracedarioamodei.com
- The machines are fine. I'm worried about us.ergosphere.blog
- The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete | WIREDwired.com
- Can AI Solve Science?-Stephen Wolfram Writingswritings.stephenwolfram.com
- Terence Tao – Kepler, Newton, and the true nature of mathematical discoverydwarkesh.com
- The necessity of machine learning theory in mitigating AI riskmishabelkin.substack.com
- The Legibility Problempress.asimov.com
- How AI Revolutionized Protein Science, but Didn’t End It | Quanta Magazinequantamagazine.org
- Economics and Transformative AI | Tom Cunningham – Tom Cunninghamtecunningham.github.io