✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
A Historical Reference of React Criticism—zachleat.com
zachleat.com · 2,064 words · saved by 1 readers
A post by Zach Leatherman (zachleat)
A Historical Reference of React Criticism #6 18k 122 119 50 February 06, 2023 Update 3 December 2025 : jsx.lol from David Bushell seems to be carrying the torch forward here cataloging newer content! There have been a number of criticisms levied at the React project over the years, some of them handled and some of them still wavering in the wind. In this post, I’ll summarize the ones that are most prominent in my memory as a way of maintaining a record (primarily for my own use but maybe you’ll find it useful too). If you have others, please send them my way ! December 2014 11.6 years ago: Res
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Making Sense of React Server Components • Josh W. Comeaujoshwcomeau.com
- The new wave of Javascript web frameworksfrontendmastery.com
- Things you forgot (or never knew) because of React - Josh Collinsworth blogjoshcollinsworth.com
- The Conductor Rewrite: What They Changed to Make It Fastperformance.dev
- Just Fucking Use Reactjustfuckingusereact.com
- The self-fulfilling prophecy of React - Josh Collinsworth blogjoshcollinsworth.com
- React is a subsidy | Infinite Wishes: A weblog by Emma Humphriesemmas.site
- Navigating the future of frontendfrontendmastery.com
- Second-guessing the modern web - macwright.commacwright.com
- How Mozilla’s Rust dramatically improved our server-side performance | Figma Blogfigma.com
- The Great Gaslighting of the JavaScript Era | The Spicy Webspicyweb.dev
- Reddit - Prove your humanityreddit.com