flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Is Science Slowing Down? — LessWrong

lesswrong.com · 8,059 words · saved by 1 readers

[This post was up a few weeks ago before getting taken down for complicated reasons. They have been sorted out and I’m trying again.] Is scientific progress slowing down? I recently got a chance to attend a conference on this topic, centered around a paper by Bloom, Jones, Reenen & Webb (2018). BJRW identify areas where technological progress is easy to measure – for example, the number of transistors on a chip. They measure the rate of progress over the past century or so, and the number of researchers in the field over the same period. For example, here’s the transistor data: This is the standard presentation of Moore’s Law – the number of transistors you can fit on a chip doubles about every two years (eg grows by 35% per year). This is usually presented as an amazing example of modern science getting things right, and no wonder – it means you can go from a few thousand transistors per chip in 1971 to many million today, with the corresponding increase in computing power. But BJRW h

x Is Science Slowing Down? — LessWrong Best of LessWrong 2018 Progress Studies Practice & Philosophy of Science Intellectual Progress (Society-Level) Stagnation Curated 136 Is Science Slowing Down? by Scott Alexander 27th Nov 2018 SSC 11 min read 77 136 [This post was up a few weeks ago before getting taken down for complicated reasons. They have been sorted out and I’m trying again.] Is scientific progress slowing down? I recently got a chance to attend a conference on this topic, centered around a paper by Bloom, Jones, Reenen & Webb (2018) . BJRW identify areas where technological progress

Explore this link on the map →

related reading