✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Overview of strong human intelligence amplification methods — LessWrong

lesswrong.com · 3,425 words · saved by 1 readers

Yes, that's basically what I mean. There's a lot of coded movements. Examples of classes of examples: So you'd first of all want to decode this stuff so that Further, there's presumably healthy, humanity-aligned ways of participating in egregores (I mean the name is a bit scary, but like, some companies, governments, religious strains, traditions, norms, grand plans, etc., are good to participate in), or in other words effective, epistemic, Good shared-intentionality-weaving. This is an entire huge and fundamental missing sector of our philosophy. We might have to understand this better to make progress on hard things. Decoding obvious egregores would be a way in. As an example, I suspect there is some sequence of words, humanly producible, maybe with prerequisites (such as having a community backing you up, or similar), that would persuade most AGI researchers to just stop--but you might need more theory to produce those words. How can we make many humans who are very good at solving

x Overview of strong human intelligence amplification methods — LessWrong Best of LessWrong 2024 Intelligence Amplification World Optimization AI Curated 305 Overview of strong human intelligence amplification methods by TsviBT 8th Oct 2024 12 min read 165 305 How can we make many humans who are very good at solving difficult problems? Summary (table of made-up numbers) I made up the made-up numbers in this table of made-up numbers; therefore, the numbers in this table of made-up numbers are made-up numbe rs. Call to action If you have a shitload of money, there are some projects you can give

Explore this link on the map →

related reading