flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Gender Imbalances Are Mostly Not Due To Offensive Attitudes | Slate Star Codex

slatestarcodex.com · 3,070 words · saved by 1 readers

[This post has mostly been replaced/supplanted with a more thorough analysis in Contra Grant On Exaggerated Differences] I. One idea that kept coming up in the comments to the thread on signal-boosting-as-doxxing: it’s permissible to take emergency action against offensive male libertarians, because we really need to improve the gender balance in libertarianism. The implied assumption is that women flock to movements full of respectful feminists, and shun the ones without them. If women aren’t in libertarianism, that’s because it’s tolerating too many sexists. Since the assumption is implicit, nobody has defended it, and maybe nobody really believes it in its explicit form. But it underlies enough of this discourse that it’s still worth challenging. Donald Trump is not a poster child for respectful inclusiveness. He is on record saying that he likes to “grab women by the pussy” in what sure sounds like a nonconsenual manner. His sophistication on gender issues is generally somewhere ar

Gender Imbalances Are Mostly Not Due To Offensive Attitudes | Slate Star Codex Home About / Top Posts Archives Top Posts Comments Feed RSS Feed Slate Star Codex Blogroll Economics Artir Kel Bryan Caplan David Friedman Pseudoerasmus Scott Sumner Tyler Cowen Effective Altruism 80000 Hours Blog Effective Altruism Forum GiveWell Blog Rationality Alyssa Vance Beeminder Elizabeth Van Nostrand Gwern Branwen Jacob Falkovich Jeff Kaufman Katja Grace Kelsey Piper Less Wrong Paul Christiano Robin Hanson Sarah Constantin Zack Davis Zvi Mowshowitz Science Andrew Gelman Greg Cochran Michael Caton Razib Khan

Explore this link on the map →

related reading