✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
In defense of Myers-Briggs
dynomight.net · 2,028 words · saved by 1 readers
examines claims that the big five personality traits is more scientifically valid than the myers briggs personality indicator
dynomight · updated Mar 2021 · psychology The Myers-Briggs Personality Indicator (MBTI) gets a lot of scorn: About 2 million people take it annually, at the behest of corporate HR departments, colleges, and even government agencies. The company that produces and markets the test makes around $20 million off it each year. The only problem? The test is completely meaningless. Why the Myers-Briggs test is totally meaningless (Vox) I began to read through the evidence, and I found that the MBTI is about as useful as a polygraph for detecting lies. One researcher even called it an “act of irrespons
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- When Personality Psychologists are High - Replicability-Indexreplicationindex.com
- Big 5 Personality Traits: The 5-Factor Model of Personalitysimplypsychology.org
- Big Five personality traits - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- How Universal Is the Big Five? Testing the Five-Factor Model of Personality Variation Among Forager–Farmers in the Bolivian Amazon - PMCpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Are some personalities just better?dynomight.net
- Ultimate Personality Test | ClearerThinking.orgprograms.clearerthinking.org
- Higher-Order Factors of Personality: Do They Exist? - PMCpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Cybernetics: The Key to a Unifying Framework for Psychologymindandmythos.substack.com
- Type Fundamentals Guide @mbti-notes - Type Theorymbti-notes.tumblr.com
- Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five - PMCncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Barnum effect - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- New paradigm for psychology just droppedexperimental-history.com