We were wrong about convergence

Several years ago, we celebrated a new era of unconditional convergence of global incomes. Since then, the trend has reversed.

We were wrong about convergence Several years ago, we celebrated a new era of unconditional convergence of global incomes. Since then, the trend has reversed. Justin Sandefur and Arvind Subramanian Dec 12, 2025 1 Share Bob Solow’s original 1956 formulation of the neoclassical growth model predicted that poorer countries would grow faster than rich ones. Capital flows—from rich to poor— would be the great leveler. Three decades later, the advent of the Penn World Tables gave economists access to comparable cross-country data to test that hypothesis rigorously. It proved false. From the 1960s th

saved by

• Katherine Driscoll
• Yudhister Joel Kumar

related reading

• The Long, Slow Death of Global Development - American Affairs Journalamericanaffairsjournal.org
• Progress Studies reading list — Daniel Maydanielmamay.github.io
• Structure and Interpretation of the Chinese Economy – Yuxi on the Wiredyuxi.ml
• The Solow Model is overrated (for explaining catch-up growth) — Basil Halperinbasilhalperin.com
• Capital in the 22nd Centuryphiliptrammell.substack.com
• Questions · Patrick Collisonpatrickcollison.com
• The short history of global living conditions and why it matters that we know it | Our World in Dataourworldindata.org
• Development Economics and Economic Growthbactra.org
• Mediumnntaleb.medium.com
• The Optimistic Thought Experiment | Hoover Institution The Optimistic Thought Experimenthoover.org
• Why Warm Countries Are Poorer - by Tomas Pueyounchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com
• The end of progress against extreme poverty? | Our World in Dataourworldindata.org