✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

ICML 2026 LLM Policy

icml.cc · 1,177 words · saved by 1 readers

ICML 2026 will follow a two-policy framework for LLM use in reviewing, based on the following two policies: Under both policies, reviewers are always responsible for the full content of their reviews. Reviewers declare which policy they want to follow, and authors declare whether they require their papers to be reviewed under Policy A, or allow them to be reviewed under Policy B. Any reviewer who is an author on a paper that requires Policy A must also be willing to follow Policy A. Submissions are matched with compatible reviewers. Each reviewer is told which policy to follow on all of their assigned papers. Reviewing data will be analyzed to inform future policies. (Full details of the two policies and the matching process are provided below.) ICML acknowledges a wide range of perspectives in our community on the use of LLMs in reviewing. This policy is designed with the following objectives in mind: The two-policy framework is an effort to navigate these competing objectives. The de

ICML 2026 LLM Policy CSP Test --> ICML 2026 Policy for LLM use in reviewing Summary ICML 2026 will follow a two-policy framework for LLM use in reviewing , based on the following two policies: Policy A (Conservative): Use of LLMs for reviewing is strictly prohibited . Policy B (Permissive): Allowed : Use of LLMs to help understand the paper and related works, and polish reviews. Submissions can be fed to privacy-compliant* LLMs. Not allowed : Ask LLMs about strengths/weaknesses, ask to suggest key points for the review, suggest an outline for the review, or write the full review *By “privacy-c

Explore this link on the map →

related reading